In the early 1970's, liberal leaders were criticized for their failure to condemn in the strongest possible terms the disruptive activities of radicals, some of whom went so far as to take over campus building, plant bombs and rob banks. Responsible political leaders of all stripes have a moral obligation to restrain the aggressive behavior of the extremes among their followers. Thus did John McCain move to tamp down aggression when anti-Obama sentiment in the fall campaign began to boil with the threats of violence. All societies - particularly those undergoing both rapid social change and economic dislocation - produce angry, violent elements. Every nation has its equivalent of biker gangs and hoodlums. At times, these groups have even come to the point of taking over the coercive authority of the state, often abetted by politicians who were then easily swept aside. Certainly this phenomenon cannot be ignored in the United States. We should be worried when anger begins to crowd out rational discussion of public policies. Democracy weakens when such groups intrude on civil debates. The Second Amendment notwithstanding, armed citizens showing up at meetings with duly elected public officials should be condemned, especially by those staunch defenders of the Constitution, the National Rifle Association. Policy by intimidation is their intent, not self-protection and certainly not open discussion, compromise and balanced representation. Rather than abetting, encouraging or tolerating disruptive anger and threats of violence, leadership demands that politicians lead their followers toward civil conduct. Frank Rich's column in the New York Times expresses this view even more pointedly as does the conservative writer David Frum.
In my humble opinion, the bars here in Washington, D.C. are unlike any other bars in the country. Where else can you consistently find CNN always on, the conversation unusually wonkish, and the majority of clientele in suits? It is a different world to be sure.
In these uncommon environments, there hasn't been a single time that I have met someone without the subject of social action and activism coming up. DC residents are passionate. Whether it is the environment, the economy, the deficit, abortion, marriage, or any number of issues, the common thread of spirits in DC is a passion for doing.
Posted by: Bryce Cullinane in Untagged on
Aug 14, 2009
We are putting together a comprehensive resource for young people wanting to gain in-depth information about careers in politics.
To help us create this resource, take one minute to answer these four quick questions.
